↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic screening identifies Axl kinase as a negative regulator of an alveolar epithelial cell phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in Laboratory Investigation, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic screening identifies Axl kinase as a negative regulator of an alveolar epithelial cell phenotype
Published in
Laboratory Investigation, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/labinvest.2017.52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoya Fujino, Hiroshi Kubo, Rose A Maciewicz

Abstract

Loss of epithelial barrier integrity is implicated in a number of human lung diseases. However, the molecular pathways underlying this process are poorly understood. In a phenotypic screen, we identified Axl kinase as a negative regulator of epithelial phenotype and function. Furthermore, suppression of Axl activity by a small molecule kinase inhibitor or downregulation of Axl expression by small interfering RNA led to: (1) the increase in epithelial surfactant protein expression; (2) a cell morphology transition from front-rear polarity to cuboidal shape; (3) the cytoskeletal re-organization resulting in decreased cell mobility; and (4) the acquisition of epithelial junctions. Loss of Axl activity reduced activation of the Axl canonical pathway members, Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 and resulted in the loss of gene expression of a unique profile of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition transcription factors including SNAI2, HOXA5, TBX2 or TBX3. Finally, we observed that Axl was activated in hyperplasia of epithelial cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis where epithelial barrier integrity was lost. These results suggest that the Axl kinase signaling pathway is associated with the loss integrity of alveolar epithelium in pathological remodeling of human lung diseases.Laboratory Investigation advance online publication, 29 May 2017; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2017.52.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Investigation
#1,608
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,162
of 327,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Investigation
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.