↓ Skip to main content

Crowding as a risk factor of meningococcal disease in Danish preschool children: A nationwide population-based case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crowding as a risk factor of meningococcal disease in Danish preschool children: A nationwide population-based case-control study
Published in
Infectious Diseases, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/00365540310017500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna Deutch, Rodrigo Labouriau, Henrik C. Schønheyeder, Lars Østergaard, Bente Nørgård, Henrik Toft Sørensen

Abstract

Meningococcal disease (MD) remains an important health problem. Crowding has been suggested to be a risk factor for MD in children, but the evidence is relatively sparse. We performed a nationwide nested case-control study comprising 1222 children with MD and 24,549 population controls. We identified MD cases younger than 6 y in the Danish National Hospital Discharge Registry from 1980 to 1999, and obtained information on household density as a measure of crowding, per capita income and other potential confounders through The Danish Civil Registration System and social registries. The risk of MD associated with household density was estimated by conditional logistic regression for children less than 1 y of age (infants) and children aged 1 to 5 y, respectively. The risk of MD increased with increasing household density. In both age groups, the crude OR was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-2.3) at a density of less than 20 m2 per person compared with the reference of more than 50 m2 per person. The adjusted OR for MD was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9) for infants, and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-2.0) for children older than 1 y. Household density appears to be a risk factor of MD in preschool children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Philippines 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Student > Master 5 23%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Social Sciences 6 27%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases
#391
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,189
of 121,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases
#172
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.