↓ Skip to main content

Confusing Terminology—Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome vs Malignant Hyperthermia—Reply

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confusing Terminology—Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome vs Malignant Hyperthermia—Reply
Published in
JAMA Neurology, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Damier, Jasem Al-Hashel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#4,955
of 5,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,586
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#66
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.