↓ Skip to main content

Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
20 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1419 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, August 2005
DOI 10.1038/nrg1656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria A. Blasco

Abstract

Telomere length and telomerase activity are important factors in the pathobiology of human disease. Age-related diseases and premature ageing syndromes are characterized by short telomeres, which can compromise cell viability, whereas tumour cells can prevent telomere loss by aberrantly upregulating telomerase. Altered functioning of both telomerase and telomere-interacting proteins is present in some human premature ageing syndromes and in cancer, and recent findings indicate that alterations that affect telomeres at the level of chromatin structure might also have a role in human disease. These findings have inspired a number of potential therapeutic strategies that are based on telomerase and telomeres.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 1%
France 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1367 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 269 19%
Student > Bachelor 226 16%
Student > Master 203 14%
Researcher 165 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 88 6%
Other 184 13%
Unknown 284 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 403 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 346 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 148 10%
Chemistry 55 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 2%
Other 133 9%
Unknown 305 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,345,654
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#651
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,811
of 69,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.