You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inverse and Direct Cancer Comorbidity in People with Central Nervous System Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Cancer Incidence in 577,013 Participants of 50 Observational Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000356498 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ferrán Catalá-López, Marta Suárez-Pinilla, Paula Suárez-Pinilla, Jose María Valderas, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto, Salvador Martinez, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Joan Climent, Alfonso Valencia, John McGrath, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Jose Sanchez-Moreno, Eduard Vieta, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos |
| Abstract |
There is a lack of scientific consensus about cancer comorbidity in people with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. This study assesses the co-occurrence of cancers in patients with CNS disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), autism spectrum disorders, Down's syndrome (DS), Huntington's disease (HD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD) and schizophrenia (SCZ). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 12% |
| Psychology | 25 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,023,726
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#99
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,064
of 322,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.