↓ Skip to main content

Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behaviour therapy for depression (COBRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behaviour therapy for depression (COBRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley Rhodes, David A Richards, David Ekers, Dean McMillan, Sarah Byford, Paul A Farrand, Simon Gilbody, Steven D Hollon, Willem Kuyken, Christopher Martell, Heather A O’Mahen, Emer O’Neill, Nigel Reed, Rod S Taylor, Ed R Watkins, Kim A Wright

Abstract

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression. However, CBT is a complex therapy that requires highly trained and qualified practitioners, and its scalability is therefore limited by the costs of training and employing sufficient therapists to meet demand. Behavioural activation (BA) is a psychological treatment for depression that may be an effective alternative to CBT and, because it is simpler, might also be delivered by less highly trained and specialised mental health workers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 17%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 49 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 57 24%