↓ Skip to main content

The Dialogical Dance: Self, Identity Construction, Positioning and Embodiment in Tango Dancers

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
The Dialogical Dance: Self, Identity Construction, Positioning and Embodiment in Tango Dancers
Published in
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12124-014-9258-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Tateo

Abstract

Argentine tango is a complex phenomenon, involving music, dancing and lifestyle, today practiced by hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. This is already a good reason for psychology to make it an object of study. Besides, studying tango could also help to develop a dialogical way of theorizing and a dialogical methodology, taking into account both the genetic historical and eso-systemic dimensions and the individual experiencing. As any other product of human psyche, tango creates an universal and abstract representation of life starting from very situated and individual acts. Such institutionalized representation, which is at the same time epistemological, ethical and aesthetical, becomes a tradition -that is the framework distanced from the individual immediate experience- within which the meaning of the experiences to be make sense in return. To illustrate this epistemological and methodological stance, a history of the development of tango as dialogical social object first is sketched. Then, an ethnographic study about the Self actuation in a community of Italian tango dancers is presented. Results show how participants construct and actuate their identities in a dialogue between their I-positions inside and outside tango community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 30%
Arts and Humanities 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,009,776
of 24,875,286 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#79
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,216
of 318,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them