| Title |
Clinical characteristics of menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurologica Belgica, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13760-017-0802-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bülent Güven, Hayat Güven, Selçuk Çomoğlu |
| Abstract |
Migraine attacks increase during the perimenstrual period in approximately half of female migraineurs. There are differences in the pathogenesis and clinical features of menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine attacks. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of migraine in patients with menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine, and to investigate the differences between premenstrual, menstrual, and late-menstrual migraine attacks. Three-hundred and thirty-two women with migraine without aura were evaluated using questionnaires and diaries to determine the characteristics of headache, preceding and accompanying symptoms, and the relation of migraine attacks and menstruation. One-hundred and sixty-three women had menstrually related migraine without aura (49.1%). Duration of disease and duration of headache were longer (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively), and nausea, vomiting, phonophobia, and aggravation of headache with physical activity were more frequent in patients with menstrually related migraine (p = 0.005, p = 0.006, p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Premonitory symptoms and allodynia were observed more frequently in the menstrually related migraine group (p = 0.012 and p = 0.004, respectively). Perimenstrual migraine attacks occurred premenstrually (days -2 and -1) in 46 patients (25.3%), menstrually (days 1 to 3) in 90 patients (49.4%), and late menstrually (days 4 to 7) in 19 patients (10.4%). Our results showed that the duration of headache was longer and accompanying symptoms were more frequent and diverse in patients with menstrually related migraine without aura, suggesting that these findings may reflect the increase in excitability or susceptibility of the brain in these patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,236,453
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#57
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,065
of 322,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.