↓ Skip to main content

Copy number polymorphism in plant genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Copy number polymorphism in plant genomes
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00122-013-2177-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnieszka Żmieńko, Anna Samelak, Piotr Kozłowski, Marek Figlerowicz

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) are genomic rearrangements resulting from gains or losses of DNA segments. Typically, the term refers to rearrangements of sequences larger than 1 kb. This type of polymorphism has recently been shown to be a key contributor to intra-species genetic variation, along with single-nucleotide polymorphisms and short insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Over the last decade, a growing number of studies have highlighted the importance of copy number variation (CNV) as a factor affecting human phenotype and individual CNVs have been linked to risks for severe diseases. In plants, the exploration of the extent and role of CNV is still just beginning. Initial genomic analyses indicate that CNVs are prevalent in plants and have greatly affected plant genome evolution. Many CNV events have been observed in outcrossing and autogamous species. CNVs are usually found on all chromosomes, with CNV hotspots interspersed with regions of very low genetic variation. Although CNV is mainly associated with intergenic regions, many CNVs encompass protein-coding genes. The collected data suggest that CNV mainly affects the members of large families of functionally redundant genes. Thus, the effects of individual CNV events on phenotype are usually modest. Nevertheless, there are many cases in which CNVs for specific genes have been linked to important traits such as flowering time, plant height and resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Recent reports suggest that CNVs may form rapidly in response to stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 269 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 21%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 17%
Computer Science 8 3%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 56 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,359,829
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#334
of 4,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,178
of 216,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.