You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Callous-Unemotional Traits, Proactive Aggression, and Treatment Outcomes of Aggressive Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph C. Blader, Steven R. Pliszka, Vivian Kafantaris, Carmel A. Foley, Judith A. Crowell, Gabrielle A. Carlson, Colin L. Sauder, David M. Margulies, Christa Sinha, Jeffrey Sverd, Thomas L. Matthews, Brigitte Y. Bailey, W. Burleson Daviss |
| Abstract |
Stimulant treatment improves impulse control among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Decreased aggression often accompanies stimulant pharmacotherapy, suggesting that impulsiveness is integral to aggressive behavior in these children. However, children with high callous-unemotional (CU) traits and proactive aggression may benefit less from ADHD pharmacotherapy, because their aggressive behavior seems more purposeful and deliberate. This study's objective was to determine whether pretreatment CU traits and proactive aggression affect treatment outcomes among aggressive children with ADHD receiving stimulant monotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 90 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 80 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,700
of 4,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,707
of 219,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.