| Title |
If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NanoEthics, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6 |
| Authors |
Alfred Nordmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 110 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 25% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 24% |
| Philosophy | 23 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,508,620
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#10
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,018
of 74,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.