↓ Skip to main content

Preventing substance misuse: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 UK (SFP 10–14 UK)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Preventing substance misuse: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 UK (SFP 10–14 UK)
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Segrott, David Gillespie, Jo Holliday, Ioan Humphreys, Simon Murphy, Ceri Phillips, Hayley Reed, Heather Rothwell, David Foxcroft, Kerenza Hood, Zoe Roberts, Jonathan Scourfield, Claire Thomas, Laurence Moore

Abstract

Prevention of alcohol, drug and tobacco misuse by young people is a key public health priority. There is a need to develop the evidence base through rigorous evaluations of innovative approaches to substance misuse prevention. The Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 is a universal family-based alcohol, drugs and tobacco prevention programme, which has achieved promising results in US trials, and which now requires cross-cultural assessment. This paper therefore describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the UK version of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (SFP 10-14 UK).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 34 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,935,906
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,143
of 14,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,078
of 304,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#44
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.