↓ Skip to main content

Best medical therapy versus intravenous thrombolysis for minor stroke: a patient-level pooled analysis of ARAMIS and TRUST trials

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke and Vascular Neurology, October 2026
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Best medical therapy versus intravenous thrombolysis for minor stroke: a patient-level pooled analysis of ARAMIS and TRUST trials
Published in
Stroke and Vascular Neurology, October 2026
DOI 10.1136/svn-2026-005589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Cui, Yong-Li Tao, Chang Cui, Gao-Peng Xing, Bo Song, Hui-Sheng Chen

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2026.
All research outputs
#28,942,001
of 34,745,622 outputs
Outputs from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
#406
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,022
of 182,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,745,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them