↓ Skip to main content

Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00123.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xu, Naveed Ejaz, Benjamin Hertler, Meret Branscheidt, Mario Widmer, Andreia V Faria, Michelle D Harran, Juan C Cortes, Nathan Kim, Pablo A Celnik, Tomoko Kitago, Andreas R Luft, John W Krakauer, Jörn Diedrichsen

Abstract

Impaired hand function after stroke is a major cause of long-term disability. We developed a novel paradigm that quantifies two critical aspects of hand function, strength and independent control of fingers (individuation), and also removes any obligate dependence between them. Hand recovery was tracked in 54 patients with hemiparesis over the first year after stroke. Most recovery of strength and individuation occurred within the first three months. A novel time-invariant recovery function was identified: recovery of strength and individuation were tightly correlated up to a strength level of approximately 60% of estimated premorbid strength; beyond this threshold, strength improvement was not accompanied by further improvement in individuation. Any additional improvement in individuation was attributable instead to a second process that superimposed on the recovery function. We conclude that two separate systems are responsible for post-stroke hand recovery: one contributes almost all of strength and some individuation; the other contributes additional individuation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 22 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 14 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 21%
Engineering 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,086,381
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#100
of 8,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,597
of 330,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#6
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.