↓ Skip to main content

Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial
Published in
Preventive Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Chubak, Andy Bogart, Sharon Fuller, Sharon S. Laing, Beverly B. Green

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the uptake of three mailed high-sensitivity fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#3,951
of 5,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,910
of 210,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#33
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.