↓ Skip to main content

How to think about mental content

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How to think about mental content
Published in
Philosophical Studies, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11098-013-0172-0
Authors

Frances Egan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 38 48%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Linguistics 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2014.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#1,090
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,960
of 211,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.