↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael F. Walsh, Vivian Y. Chang, Wendy K. Kohlmann, Hamish S. Scott, Christopher Cunniff, Franck Bourdeaut, Jan J. Molenaar, Christopher C. Porter, John T. Sandlund, Sharon E. Plon, Lisa L. Wang, Sharon A. Savage

Abstract

DNA repair syndromes are heterogeneous disorders caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins key in DNA replication and/or the cellular response to DNA damage. The majority of these syndromes are inherited in an autosomal-recessive manner, but autosomal-dominant and X-linked recessive disorders also exist. The clinical features of patients with DNA repair syndromes are highly varied and dependent on the underlying genetic cause. Notably, all patients have elevated risks of syndrome-associated cancers, and many of these cancers present in childhood. Although it is clear that the risk of cancer is increased, there are limited data defining the true incidence of cancer and almost no evidence-based approaches to cancer surveillance in patients with DNA repair disorders. This article is the product of the October 2016 AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, which brought together experts from around the world to discuss and develop cancer surveillance guidelines for children with cancer-prone disorders. Herein, we focus on the more common of the rare DNA repair disorders: ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome, Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, and Xeroderma pigmentosum. Dedicated syndrome registries and a combination of basic science and clinical research have led to important insights into the underlying biology of these disorders. Given the rarity of these disorders, it is recommended that centralized centers of excellence be involved directly or through consultation in caring for patients with heritable DNA repair syndromes. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e23-e31. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 126 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Other 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,626,618
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,295
of 12,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,740
of 316,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#51
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.