↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Epidemiology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Annals of Epidemiology, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sallyanne Nguyen-Pham, Janni Leung, Deirdre McLaughlin

Abstract

Survival from breast cancer is dependent on stage at diagnosis and some evidence suggests that rural women are more likely than urban women to be diagnosed with advanced stage disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the stage of breast cancer at diagnosis between women residing in urban and rural areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 18 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,811,056
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Epidemiology
#349
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,425
of 319,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Epidemiology
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.