You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T.E. McAlindon, R.R. Bannuru, M.C. Sullivan, N.K. Arden, F. Berenbaum, S.M. Bierma-Zeinstra, G.A. Hawker, Y. Henrotin, D.J. Hunter, H. Kawaguchi, K. Kwoh, S. Lohmander, F. Rannou, E.M. Roos, M. Underwood |
| Abstract |
To develop concise, up-to-date, patient-focused, evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), intended to inform patients, physicians, and allied healthcare professionals worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 17% |
| United States | 17 | 10% |
| Spain | 16 | 10% |
| Australia | 14 | 8% |
| Canada | 10 | 6% |
| Russia | 6 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 75% |
| Scientists | 20 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,800 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2763 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 397 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 332 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 265 | 9% |
| Researcher | 257 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 224 | 8% |
| Other | 597 | 21% |
| Unknown | 728 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 881 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 369 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 116 | 4% |
| Engineering | 100 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 88 | 3% |
| Other | 397 | 14% |
| Unknown | 849 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#196,597
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#13
of 3,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,761
of 324,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.