↓ Skip to main content

Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth): leaf and root morphology and carbon partitioning

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth): leaf and root morphology and carbon partitioning
Published in
Trees, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00468-005-0011-9
Authors

Stella Aspelmeier, Christoph Leuschner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Estonia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 52%
Environmental Science 24 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#111
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,011
of 59,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them