↓ Skip to main content

Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet medical need: facts and numbers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
patent
10 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
518 Mendeley
Title
Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet medical need: facts and numbers
Published in
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13539-010-0002-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan von Haehling, Stefan D. Anker

Abstract

Cachexia is a serious, however underestimated and underrecognised medical consequence of malignant cancer, chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, infectious diseases, and many other chronic illnesses. The prevalence of cachexia is high, ranging from 5% to 15% in CHF or COPD to 60% to 80% in advanced cancer. By population prevalence, the most frequent cachexia subtypes are in order: COPD cachexia, cardiac cachexia (in CHF), cancer cachexia, and CKD cachexia. In industrialized countries (North America, Europe, Japan), the overall prevalence of cachexia (due to any disease) is growing and currently about 1%, i.e., about nine million patients. The relative prevalence of cachexia is somewhat less in Asia, but is a growing problem there as well. In absolute terms, cachexia is, in Asia (due to the larger population), as least as big a problem as in the Western world. Cachexia is also a big medical problem in South America and Africa, but data are scarce. A consensus statement recently proposed to diagnose cachexia in chronic diseases when there is weight loss exceeding 5% within the previous 3-12 months combined with symptoms characteristic for cachexia (e.g., fatigue), loss of skeletal muscle and biochemical abnormalities (e.g., anemia or inflammation). Treatment approaches using anabolics, anti-catabolic therapies, appetite stimulants, and nutritional interventions are under development. A more thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of cachexia development and progression is needed that likely will lead to combination therapies being developed. These efforts are greatly needed as presence of cachexia is always associated with high-mortality and poor-symptom status and dismal quality of life. It is thought that in cancer, more than 30% of patients die due to cachexia and more than 50% of patients with cancer die with cachexia being present. In other chronic illnesses, one can estimate that up to 30% of patients die with some degree of cachexia being present. Mortality rates of patients with cachexia range from 10% to 15% per year (COPD), to 20% to 30% per year (CHF, CKD) to 80% in cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 505 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Researcher 53 10%
Other 29 6%
Other 99 19%
Unknown 114 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 9%
Sports and Recreations 19 4%
Other 68 13%
Unknown 134 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,070,507
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#260
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,617
of 108,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them