↓ Skip to main content

International variations in childhood cancer in indigenous populations: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International variations in childhood cancer in indigenous populations: a systematic review
Published in
Lancet Oncology, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70553-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia C Valery, Suzanne P Moore, Judith Meiklejohn, Freddie Bray

Abstract

Although the cancer burden in indigenous children has been reported in some countries, up to now, no international comparison has been made. We therefore aimed to assess the available evidence of the burden of childhood cancer in indigenous populations. We did a systematic review of reports on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival in indigenous children worldwide. Our findings highlight the paucity of accessible information and advocate the pressing need for data by indigenous status in countries where population-based cancer registries are established. The true extent of disparities between the burden in the indigenous community needs to be measured so that targeted programmes for cancer control can be planned and implemented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,184,379
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#5,134
of 6,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,017
of 323,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#68
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.