↓ Skip to main content

Direct and social genetic parameters for growth and fin damage traits in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Direct and social genetic parameters for growth and fin damage traits in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-46-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne M Nielsen, Brage B Monsen, Jørgen Ødegård, Piter Bijma, Børge Damsgård, Hilde Toften, Ingrid Olesen

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects (SGE) for growth and welfare traits in farmed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). A SGE refers to the effect of an individual's genes on trait performance of its social partners. In total, 2100 individually tagged juveniles from 100 families at an average age of 222 days post-hatching were used. Each family was separated into three groups of seven fish, and were randomly assigned to 100 experimental tanks, together with fish from two other families. Body weight and length of the first, second and third dorsal fin and the caudal fin measured by digital image analysis were measured at the start of the experiment, after two weeks, and after six weeks. Fin erosion was scored subjectively after six weeks. Variance components estimated using a conventional animal model were compared to those of an animal model including a SGE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Professor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 64%
Unspecified 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#550
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,466
of 320,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.