↓ Skip to main content

The Psychological Effects of Strength Exercises in People who are Overweight or Obese: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
81 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
The Psychological Effects of Strength Exercises in People who are Overweight or Obese: A Systematic Review
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0748-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill A. ten Hoor, Gerjo Kok, Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters, Tim Frissen, Annemie M. W. J. Schols, Guy Plasqui

Abstract

Overweightness and obesity represent a high burden on well-being and society. Strength training has positive effects on body composition and metabolic health for people who are overweight or obese. The evidence for psychological effects of strength exercises is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the psychological effects of strength exercises for people who are overweight or obese. Relevant literature was identified by use of the PubMed and PsycINFO databases. For each study, effect sizes and corresponding variance estimates were extracted or calculated for the main effects of strength exercises on psychological outcomes. Seventeen studies were included. There was almost no overlap among the various measures of psychological constructs. The constructs were ordered into eight broad categories. Meta-analytical techniques revealed substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes, and combined with the low number of effect size estimates for each outcome measure, this precluded meta-analysis. Organization of the data showed that the evidence base so far does not show convincing effects of strength training on psychological outcome measures. Some weak effects emerged on self-efficacy, self-esteem, inhibition, and psychological disorders (e.g., anxiety and depression). No additional or comparable effects to other interventions were found for mood, outcome expectations, quality of life, and stress. The main finding of this review is that despite a strong theoretical basis for expecting positive effects of strength training on psychological outcomes, the literature shows a large gap in this area. The existing research does not show a clear picture: some positive results might exist, but there is a strong need to accumulate more evidence before drawing conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 43 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Sports and Recreations 20 14%
Psychology 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#802,632
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#733
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,378
of 331,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.