↓ Skip to main content

How I “Improved” My Teaching Evaluations: A Survival Manual for the Politically Incorrect

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Questions, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
How I “Improved” My Teaching Evaluations: A Survival Manual for the Politically Incorrect
Published in
Academic Questions, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12129-010-9187-6
Authors

“A Great Teacher”

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,291,764
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Academic Questions
#87
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,620
of 98,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Questions
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them