↓ Skip to main content

Placebo‐controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐9)

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Placebo‐controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐9)
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/dom.12937
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Pozzilli, Paul Norwood, Esteban Jódar, Melanie J. Davies, Tibor Ivanyi, Honghua Jiang, D. Bradley Woodward, Zvonko Milicevic

Abstract

Compare the addition of weekly dulaglutide versus the addition of placebo to titrated glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with sub-optimal HbA1c . Patients (N = 300) from this Phase 3, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study were randomised to weekly subcutaneous injections of dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo with titrated daily glargine (mean ± SD baseline dose: 39 ± 22 U), with or without metformin (≥1,500 mg/day). The primary objective was superiority of dulaglutide/glargine to placebo/glargine on change from baseline in HbA1c at 28 weeks. LSM ± SE HbA1c changes from baseline were -1.44 ± 0.09% (-15.74 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with dulaglutide/glargine and -0.67 ± 0.09% (-7.32 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with placebo/glargine at 28 weeks (LSM difference [95% CI]: -0.77% [-0.97%, -0.56%]; p < 0.001). Body weight reduced with dulaglutide/glargine and increased with placebo/glargine (LSM difference: -2.41 ± 0.39 kg; p < 0.001). Increases from baseline in mean glargine dose were significantly smaller with dulaglutide/glargine versus placebo/glargine (13 ± 2 U [0.1 ± 0.02 U/kg] versus 26 ± 2 U [0.3 ± 0.02 U/kg], respectively; p < 0.001; LSM ± SE final dose: dulaglutide/glargine, 51 ± 2 U; placebo/glargine, 65 ± 2 U). Hypoglycaemia rate (for ≤3.9 mmol/L threshold) was 7.69 ± 15.15 and 8.56 ± 16.13 events/patient/year, respectively (p = 0.488). One episode of severe hypoglycaemia occurred with dulaglutide/glargine. Common gastrointestinal adverse events with dulaglutide were nausea (12.0%), diarrhoea (11.3%), and vomiting (6.0%). Weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg added to basal insulin is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option for patients with T2D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,167,753
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#1,214
of 3,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,076
of 324,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#36
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.