You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oncology Nursing Forum, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1188/17.onf.e111-e123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haryani Haryani, Susan Jane Fetzer, Ching-Lin Wu, Yu-Yun Hsu |
| Abstract |
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting chemotherapy toxicity, which has a long-lasting effect and decreases quality of life. Although several tools have been developed to detect CIPN, the study quality, psychometric properties, and practicality of CIPN assessment tools have not been systematically reviewed. . Electronic searches using keywords were conducted in Medline, PubMed, CINAHL®, and Cochrane Library for articles published from 1980-2015. Eligible studies were included if they involved patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, provided CIPN assessment tools with psychometric properties, and were published in English. . Data were extracted, and study quality was assessed. CIPN tools were evaluated in terms of psychometric properties and practicality. . A total of 19 studies describing 20 tools were reviewed. The quality of studies varied from strong to weak. The validity ranged from low to high, and the reliability with internal consistency ranged from 0.56-0.96. Poor inter-rater agreement was found. Not all of the tools were deemed practical. . Considering the psychometric properties and practicality, two tools (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity [FACT/GOG-Ntx] and Total Neuropathy Score [TNS]) are recommended for assessing CIPN. . Routine assessment of CIPN and choosing appropriate assessment tools are imperative. The FACT/GOG-Ntx and TNS are recommended for clinical use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,349,470
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Oncology Nursing Forum
#355
of 641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,503
of 310,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology Nursing Forum
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 641 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.