↓ Skip to main content

Photoresponsive porous materials: the design and synthesis of photochromic diarylethene-based linkers and a metal–organic framework

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Communications, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 21,255)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photoresponsive porous materials: the design and synthesis of photochromic diarylethene-based linkers and a metal–organic framework
Published in
Chemical Communications, January 2014
DOI 10.1039/c3cc49666j
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dinesh G. Patel, Ian M. Walton, Jordan M. Cox, Cody J. Gleason, David R. Butzer, Jason B. Benedict

Abstract

The synthesis and characterization of novel photochromic diarylethene-based linkers for use in metal–organic frameworks is described including crystal structure analysis of nearly all reaction intermediates. The bis-carboxylated dithien-3-ylphenanthrenes can be prepared under relatively mild conditions in high yield and were subsequently used to create a photoresponsive metal–organic framework, UBMOF-1. While the photochromism of the ligand TPDC in solution is fully reversible, the cycloreversion reaction is suppressed when this linker is incorporated into the crystalline framework of UBMOF-1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 34%
Researcher 16 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 53 61%
Materials Science 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#337,598
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Communications
#21
of 21,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,506
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Communications
#1
of 956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.