↓ Skip to main content

Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3725-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Fanti, Silvia Minozzi, Joshua James Morigi, Frederik Giesel, Francesco Ceci, Christian Uprimny, Michael S. Hofman, Matthias Eiber, Sarah Schwarzenbock, Paolo Castellucci, Cristina Bellisario, Stéphane Chauvie, Fabrizio Bergesio, Louise Emmett, Uwe Haberkorn, Irene Virgolini, Markus Schwaiger, Rodney J. Hicks, Bernd J. Krause, Arturo Chiti

Abstract

After primary treatment, biochemical relapse (BCR) occurs in a substantial number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). PET/CT imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen based tracers (68Ga-PSMA) has shown promising results for BCR patients. However, a standardized image interpretation methodology has yet to be properly agreed. The aim of this study, which was promoted and funded by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), is to define standardized image interpretation criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect recurrent PCa lesions in patients treated with primary curative intent therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) who presented a biochemical recurrence. In the first phase inter-rater agreement between seven readers from seven international centers was calculated on the reading of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images of 49 patients with BCR. Each reader evaluated findings in five different sites of recurrence (local, loco-regional lymph nodes, distant lymph nodes, bone, and other). In the second phase the re-analysis was limited to cases with poor, slight, fair, or moderate agreement [Krippendorff's (K) alpha<0.61]. Finally, on the basis of the consensus readings, we sought to define a list of revised consensus criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT interpretation. Between-reader agreement for the presence of anomalous findings in any of the five sites was only moderate (K's alpha: 0.47). The agreement improved and became substantial when readers had to judge whether the anomalous findings were suggestive for a pathologic, uncertain, or non-pathologic image (K's alpha: 0.64). K's alpha calculations for each of the five sites of recurrence were also performed and evaluated. First Delphi round was thus conducted. A more detailed definition of the criteria was proposed by the project coordinator, which was then discussed and finally agreed by the seven readers. After the second Delphi round only four cases of disagreement still remained. These were evaluated for a final round, allowing a final agreement table to be written. We hope that by developing these consensus guidelines on the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, clinicians reporting these studies will be able to provide more consistent clinical reports and that within clinical trials, abnormality classifications will be harmonized, allowing more robust assessment of its diagnostic performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Other 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 57%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,759,754
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#836
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,780
of 315,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.