↓ Skip to main content

Mitigating bycatch in tuna fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Mitigating bycatch in tuna fisheries
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9478-x
Authors

Martin Hall, Eric Gilman, Hiroshi Minami, Takahisa Mituhasi, Erin Carruthers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,652,591
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#82
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,768
of 331,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.