↓ Skip to main content

The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10853-017-1114-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Phillips, Awadh Al-Ahmadi, Sarah-Jane Potts, Tim Claypole, Davide Deganello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 19%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 87 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 22%
Chemistry 44 15%
Materials Science 37 13%
Physics and Astronomy 13 4%
Chemical Engineering 12 4%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 103 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,206,788
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#905
of 4,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,619
of 310,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#8
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.