You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.036 |
| Authors |
Richard Frankham, Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Barry W. Brook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Namibia | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 69% |
| Scientists | 22 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,076 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1041 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 205 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 202 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 4% |
| Other | 151 | 14% |
| Unknown | 169 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 516 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 182 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 106 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 47 | 4% |
| Unknown | 209 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#194,932
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#118
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,741
of 328,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.