You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Mechanistic Role of Kinases in the Regulation of Mitochondrial Fitness
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 26 |
| Book title |
Mitochondrial Dynamics in Cardiovascular Medicine
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-55330-6_26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-955329-0, 978-3-31-955330-6
|
| Authors |
Daniela Sorriento, Jessica Gambardella, Antonella Fiordelisi, Bruno Trimarco, Michele Ciccarelli, Guido Iaccarino, Gaetano Santulli |
| Editors |
Gaetano Santulli |
| Abstract |
Mounting evidence indicates that mitochondria contain multiple phosphorylation substrates and that protein kinases translocate into mitochondria, suggesting that protein phosphorylation in this organelle could be fundamental for the regulation of its own function. Here we examine the mechanistic role of cellular kinases in the fine regulation of key mitochondrial activities, including mitochondrial quality control, fission/fusion processes, metabolism, and mitophagy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,982
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,982
of 313,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#98
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.