↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Low-Level Vagus Nerve Stimulation Suppresses Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Inflammation A Randomized Study

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Low-Level Vagus Nerve Stimulation Suppresses Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Inflammation A Randomized Study
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stavros Stavrakis, Mary Beth Humphrey, Benjamin Scherlag, Omer Iftikhar, Purvi Parwani, Mubasher Abbas, Adrian Filiberti, Christian Fleming, Yanqing Hu, Paul Garabelli, Arthur McUnu, Marvin Peyton, Sunny S. Po

Abstract

This study sought to examine the efficacy of low-level vagus nerve stimulation (LLVNS) in suppressing post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and inflammatory cytokines in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. POAF often complicates cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to active or sham LLVNS. In all patients, a bipolar wire was sutured to the vagus nerve pre-ganglionic fibers alongside the lateral aspect of the superior vena cava. High-frequency (20 Hz) stimulation, 50% below the threshold for slowing the heart rate, was delivered for 72 h in the LLVNS group. The development of POAF was monitored continuously during the entire hospital stay by use of telemetry. Blood was collected on arrival in the intensive care unit and at 24 and 72 h for measurement of inflammatory cytokines. Patients were followed up within 1 month after cardiac surgery. A total of 54 patients were randomized to either active LLVNS (n = 26) or sham control (n = 28). The baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced in the 2 groups. POAF occurred in 3 patients (12%) in the LLVNS group and 10 patients (36%) in the control group (hazard ratio: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.85; p = 0.027). None of the patients developed any complications as a result of wire placement. At 72 h, serum tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were significantly lower in the LLVNS group than in the control group. These data suggest that LLVNS suppresses POAF and attenuates inflammation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Further studies are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 61 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 25%
Engineering 10 7%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 70 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,376,713
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#286
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,951
of 329,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.