↓ Skip to main content

Partizipative Methoden zur Erfassung und Verarbeitung von Geoinformationen

Overview of attention for article published in HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Partizipative Methoden zur Erfassung und Verarbeitung von Geoinformationen
Published in
HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, May 2017
DOI 10.1365/s40702-017-0331-4
Authors

Luisa Griesbaum, Melanie Eckle, Benjamin Herfort, Martin Raifer, Alexander Zipf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik
#125
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,957
of 313,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.