↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical High-Order Functional Connectivity Networks and Selective Feature Fusion for MCI Classification

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Hierarchical High-Order Functional Connectivity Networks and Selective Feature Fusion for MCI Classification
Published in
Neuroinformatics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12021-017-9330-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaobo Chen, Han Zhang, Seong-Whan Lee, Dinggang Shen, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Conventional Functional connectivity (FC) analysis focuses on characterizing the correlation between two brain regions, whereas the high-order FC can model the correlation between two brain region pairs. To reduce the number of brain region pairs, clustering is applied to group all the brain region pairs into a small number of clusters. Then, a high-order FC network can be constructed based on the clustering result. By varying the number of clusters, multiple high-order FC networks can be generated and the one with the best overall performance can be finally selected. However, the important information contained in other networks may be simply discarded. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose to make full use of the information contained in all high-order FC networks. First, an agglomerative hierarchical clustering technique is applied such that the clustering result in one layer always depends on the previous layer, thus making the high-order FC networks in the two consecutive layers highly correlated. As a result, the features extracted from high-order FC network in each layer can be decomposed into two parts (blocks), i.e., one is redundant while the other might be informative or complementary, with respect to its previous layer. Then, a selective feature fusion method, which combines sequential forward selection and sparse regression, is developed to select a feature set from those informative feature blocks for classification. Experimental results confirm that our novel method outperforms the best single high-order FC network in diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 24%
Engineering 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,214,277
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#68
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,601
of 314,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them