| Title |
Ionic Signaling in Plant Responses to Gravity and Touch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, May 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003440010049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremiah M. Fasano, Gioia D. Massa, Simon Gilroy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,475,076
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#101
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,364
of 126,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them