↓ Skip to main content

Membrane fluidity controls redox-regulated cold stress responses in cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Membrane fluidity controls redox-regulated cold stress responses in cyanobacteria
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11120-017-0337-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene G. Maksimov, Kirill S. Mironov, Marina S. Trofimova, Natalya L. Nechaeva, Daria A. Todorenko, Konstantin E. Klementiev, Georgy V. Tsoraev, Eugene V. Tyutyaev, Anna A. Zorina, Pavel V. Feduraev, Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev, Vladimir Z. Paschenko, Dmitry A. Los

Abstract

Membrane fluidity is the important regulator of cellular responses to changing ambient temperature. Bacteria perceive cold by the transmembrane histidine kinases that sense changes in thickness of the cytoplasmic membrane due to its rigidification. In the cyanobacterium Synechocystis, about a half of cold-responsive genes is controlled by the light-dependent transmembrane histidine kinase Hik33, which also partially controls the responses to osmotic, salt, and oxidative stress. This implies the existence of some universal, but yet unknown signal that triggers adaptive gene expression in response to various stressors. Here we selectively probed the components of photosynthetic machinery and functionally characterized the thermodynamics of cyanobacterial photosynthetic membranes with genetically altered fluidity. We show that the rate of oxidation of the quinone pool (PQ), which interacts with both photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport chains, depends on membrane fluidity. Inhibitor-induced stimulation of redox changes in PQ triggers cold-induced gene expression. Thus, the fluidity-dependent changes in the redox state of PQ may universally trigger cellular responses to stressors that affect membrane properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#628
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,142
of 418,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.