↓ Skip to main content

Role of TGF-β in metastatic colon cancer: it is finally time for targeted therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Role of TGF-β in metastatic colon cancer: it is finally time for targeted therapy
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00441-017-2633-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Villalba, Stephanie R. Evans, Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha, Alfonso Calvo

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent tumor types in Western countries. Approximately 20 % of patients show metastasis at the time of diagnosis, with the liver being one of the most affected organs. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) plays a regulatory role not only in the physiology of the normal colon but also in the development of CRC and its metastatic process. In this review, we analyze the molecular mechanisms leading to TGF-β dysregulation in tumor and stroma cells and the modification of the microenvironment that fosters CRC metastasis. Recent genomic studies have identified a CRC subtype with a mesenchymal and aggressive phenotype having TGF-β as a hub gene of this signature. Consistent with these findings, the inhibition of TGF-β signaling has been shown to impair experimental CRC metastasis to the liver. Based on these and other results conducted in various tumor types, the pharmaceutical industry has developed a variety of strategies to target TGF-β. We provide up-to-date information of these therapies, which are currently in preclinical or clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,331,154
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#453
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,974
of 317,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.