↓ Skip to main content

The Logic of Knowledge and the Flow of Information

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The Logic of Knowledge and the Flow of Information
Published in
Minds and Machines, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11023-013-9310-x
Authors

Simon D’Alfonso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 30%
Philosophy 5 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,546,919
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#203
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,197
of 197,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.