| Title |
Developing the skill of laryngeal mask insertion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Anaesthesiologie, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00101-013-2185-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Mohr, M.A. Weigand, S. Hofer, E. Martin, A. Gries, A. Walther, M. Bernhard |
| Abstract |
Laryngeal mask insertion (LMI) represents a fundamental skill for anesthesiologists in routine management as well as in difficult airway situations. This study aimed to evaluate the time needed by first year anesthesiology residents to perform 40 LMIs and assessed the associated success rates and the number of attempts needed for successful LMI. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 81% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#126
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,941
of 210,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.