↓ Skip to main content

Orthopedic surgeons feel that there is a treatment gap in management of early OA: international survey

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Orthopedic surgeons feel that there is a treatment gap in management of early OA: international survey
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2529-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan Silvia Li, Jon Karlsson, Mitchell Winemaker, Parag Sancheti, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract

To understand orthopedic surgeons' views, preferences, and awareness on "treatment gap" and various conservative and surgical treatments for early to mid-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). A self-administered questionnaire on the treatment of knee OA was developed in collaboration with orthopedic surgeons with extensive research experience and methodological expertise. The survey was distributed electronically to a group of international orthopedic surgeons and surgical trainees. The data were collected, reviewed, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. One hundred and seventy-three surgeons and surgical trainees completed the survey. The respondents reported that about 58 % of the patients they treat have early to mid-stage knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade I-III). There were significantly higher usage of medications and lower usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (P < 0.05) in developing countries than in developed countries. Four of five surgeons (84 %) perceived a need for better treatments for younger (<60 years old) physically active OA patients in which UKA or TKA is not indicated. Most respondents (80 %) would be willing to adjust age/activity threshold for surgery if a procedure was reversible and recovery was minimal. Two of three surgeons (68.4 %) perceived a treatment gap for early knee OA. However, effective treatments for patients within the treatment gap would have substantial positive social, and economic impacts. The study suggests an ongoing treatment gap for patients with early knee OA and the need for better evidence to guide practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Engineering 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,439,080
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,000
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,681
of 196,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.