↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00068-017-0803-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. İ. Şaşmaz, A. H. Akça

Abstract

In this study, the reliability of trauma management scenario videos (in English) on YouTube and their compliance with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS(®)) guidelines were investigated. The search was conducted on February 15, 2016 by using the terms "assessment of trauma" and ''management of trauma''. All videos that were uploaded between January 2011 and June 2016 were viewed by two experienced emergency physicians. The data regarding the date of upload, the type of the uploader, duration of the video and view counts were recorded. The videos were categorized according to the video source and scores. The search results yielded 880 videos. Eight hundred and thirteen videos were excluded by the researchers. The distribution of videos by years was found to be balanced. The scores of videos uploaded by an institution were determined to be higher compared to other groups (p = 0.003). The findings of this study display that trauma management videos on YouTube in the majority of cases are not reliable/compliant with ATLS-guidelines and can therefore not be recommended for educational purposes. These data may only be used in public education after making necessary arrangements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%