↓ Skip to main content

Genetische Architektur der amyotrophen Lateralsklerose und frontotemporalen Demenz

Overview of attention for article published in Der Nervenarzt, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Genetische Architektur der amyotrophen Lateralsklerose und frontotemporalen Demenz
Published in
Der Nervenarzt, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00115-017-0349-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Synofzik, M. Otto, A. Ludolph, J. H. Weishaupt

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) overlap not only clinically, but also with respect to shared neuropathology and genes. A large number of novel genes has recently been identified which underlie both diseases, e. g., C9orf72, TARDBP, GRN, TBK1, UBQLN2, VCP, CHCHD10, or SQSTM1. In contrast, other genes are still largely associated with only one of the two diseases, e. g., SOD1 with ALS or MAPT with FTD. These genetic findings indicate a large number of shared mechanisms, yet along with still a certain cell-specific vulnerability. The recently identified genes are not only key to investigate the pathophysiology underlying ALS and FTD, but also the first step in the development of causal gene- or pathway-specific therapies. Mutations in these genes are also found in a substantial share of seemingly "sporadic" ALS and FTD patients. Given the large genetic heterogeneity with more than >25 genes having been identified for ALS and FTD, genetic diagnostics should - after exclusion of C9orf72 repeat expansions - no longer resort to single gene-diagnostics, but rather use next generation sequencing panels or whole exome sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Neuroscience 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,043,140
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Der Nervenarzt
#58
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,372
of 317,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Nervenarzt
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.