↓ Skip to main content

The impact of change of renal replacement therapy modality on sleep quality in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
The impact of change of renal replacement therapy modality on sleep quality in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40620-017-0409-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Kennedy, S. A. Ryan, T. Kane, R. W. Costello, P. J. Conlon

Abstract

Sleep disorders are common and multi-factorial in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sleep disorders and disturbance have a negative impact on wellbeing and quality of life. To assess the impact of a change in renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality on sleep quality and sleep disturbance in patients with ESRD. Multiple electronic databases were searched without publication type/period restrictions. The reference lists of all included articles were manually searched for additional citations. Non-published data was identified by hand searching key conference abstracts. Participants of interest were adult patients with ESRD requiring RRT [conventional haemodialysis (HD), short daily HD, nocturnal HD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), continuous cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) or transplantation]. The exposure or intervention of interest was switch of RRT modality. Two reviewers independently assessed all studies for inclusion and extracted relevant data. Sixteen studies with a combined total of 670 patients and 191 controls were included for review and described in detail. Looking specifically at restless leg syndrome, symptoms resolved in over 60% of affected patients with a switch to increased intensity RRT (either intensive HD, CCPD or transplant). Meta-analysis of the nine studies that looked specifically at sleep apnoea parameters again favoured intensive RRT over standard/conventional RRT (conventional HD or CAPD) with statistical significance [Risk ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.51-0.84)]. Meta-analysis of all studies favoured a switch to increased intensity RRT in terms of overall sleep quality, with statistical significance [Risk ratio 0.58 (95% CI 0.40-8.83)]. Restriction to the English language may have introduced selection bias. Funnel plot analysis suggested there was also an element of publication bias. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection, means of sleep quality assessment and modality switch. Sleep disturbance, sleep apnoea and restless legs syndrome all tend to improve when a switch is made to intensive dialysis or transplant. This is important information for patients struggling with disturbed sleep and marked fatigue. This hypothesis-generating review highlights the need for more high quality prospective research in the area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Researcher 15 16%
Other 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Psychology 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,821,199
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#541
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,355
of 319,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.