↓ Skip to main content

Unsupervised class labeling of diffuse lung diseases using frequent attribute patterns

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Unsupervised class labeling of diffuse lung diseases using frequent attribute patterns
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1476-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shingo Mabu, Masanao Obayashi, Takashi Kuremoto, Noriaki Hashimoto, Yasushi Hirano, Shoji Kido

Abstract

For realizing computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of computed tomography (CT) images, many pattern recognition methods have been applied to automatic classification of normal and abnormal opacities; however, for the learning of accurate classifier, a large number of images with correct labels are necessary. It is a very time-consuming and impractical task for radiologists to give correct labels for a large number of CT images. In this paper, to solve the above problem and realize an unsupervised class labeling mechanism without using correct labels, a new clustering algorithm for diffuse lung diseases using frequent attribute patterns is proposed. A large number of frequently appeared patterns of opacities are extracted by a data mining algorithm named genetic network programming (GNP), and the extracted patterns are automatically distributed to several clusters using genetic algorithm (GA). In this paper, lung CT images are used to make clusters of normal and diffuse lung diseases. After executing the pattern extraction by GNP, 1,148 frequent attribute patterns were extracted; then, GA was executed to make clusters. This paper deals with making clusters of normal and five kinds of abnormal opacities (i.e., six-class problem), and then, the proposed method without using correct class labels in the training showed 47.7 % clustering accuracy. It is clarified that the proposed method can make clusters without using correct labels and has the potential to apply to CAD, reducing the time cost for labeling CT images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Engineering 5 16%
Computer Science 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#674
of 855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,543
of 337,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.