↓ Skip to main content

Utilizing pigment-producing fungi to add commercial value to American beech (Fagus grandifolia)

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Utilizing pigment-producing fungi to add commercial value to American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3576-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara C. Robinson, Daniela Tudor, Paul A. Cooper

Abstract

American beech (Fagus grandifolia) is an abundant, underutilized tree in certain areas of North America, and methods to increase its market value are of considerable interest. This research utilized pigment-producing fungi to induce color in American beech to potentially establish its use as a decorative wood. Wood samples were inoculated with Trametes versicolor, Xylaria polymorpha, Inonotus hispidus, and Arthrographis cuboidea to induce fungal pigmentation. Black pigmentation (T. versicolor, X. polymorpha, I. hispidus) was sporadic, occurred primarily on the surfaces of the heartwood, but not internally. Pink pigmentation (A. cuboidea) occurred throughout all of the tested beech samples, but was difficult to see in the heartwood due to the darker color of the wood. To increase the visibility of the pink stain, beech blocks were pretreated with T. versicolor for 4 weeks before being inoculated with A. cuboidea. This method significantly increased the saturation of the pink stain on both beech heartwood and sapwood, creating coloration similar to that found on sugar maple. This value-adding process should be particularly effective for small-scale wood pigmentation, and should help establish a market for this currently underutilized wood species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 36%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2011.
All research outputs
#6,324,643
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,282
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,521
of 133,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#17
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.