↓ Skip to main content

Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9013-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuno C. Cruz, Sónia M. Rodrigues, Lina Carvalho, Armando C. Duarte, Eduarda Pereira, Paul F.A.M. Römkens, Luís A.C. Tarelho

Abstract

Although bottom ash (BA) [or mixtures of bottom and fly ash (FA)] from clean biomass fuels is currently used as liming agent, additive for compost, and fertilizer on agricultural and forest soils in certain European countries, in several other countries most of the ashes are currently disposed in landfills. This is due to both a lack of a proper classification of the materials and of regulatory barriers.Chemical characterization including analysis of an array of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) proved that over 100,000 tons of BA currently landfilled every year in Portugal actually complied with legal limits for PTEs for soil fertilizers applied in other countries. Pot experiments were conducted, testing three dosages of BA and FA (1, 2.5, and 5%, in weight) in three mining soils with different properties. Additions of ash materials to soils led to an increase in the pore water pH relative to control pots (0% of ash added) and had a clear impact on DOC and on the solubilization of both macro- and micronutrients (notably Cu).The results from the case study using BA and FA from a Portuguese biomass thermal power plant demonstrate that it is imperative to further develop a regulatory framework to alleviate technological and environmental barriers for biomass ash utilization as raw material for fertilizers and/or soil liming agent, in accordance with the goals of the circular economy. A more harmonized view on how to assess the merits and risks of the re-use of these materials is also needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 22%
Environmental Science 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 39 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#817
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,421
of 313,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#16
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.