| Title |
Using data from online social networks in conservation science: which species engage people the most on Twitter?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0629-2 |
| Authors |
Jean-Michel Roberge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#536,127
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#54
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,306
of 328,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.