↓ Skip to main content

『斉民要術』に基づいた東アジアの古代乳製品の再現と同定

Overview of attention for article published in Milk Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
110 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
『斉民要術』に基づいた東アジアの古代乳製品の再現と同定
Published in
Milk Science, March 2014
DOI 10.11465/milk.59.9
Authors

平田 昌弘, 米田 佑子, 有賀 秀子, 内田 健治, 元島 英雅, 花田 正明, 河合 正人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#461,696
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Milk Science
#1
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,960
of 237,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Milk Science
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 44 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.